In simple
terms, interdisciplinarity can be defined as a collaboration of two or more
disciplines around a joint theme. Roland Barthes maintained that ‘interdisciplinarity
means the creation of a new object of study that no existing discipline owns’. The interdisciplinary approach in history refers to the use of methods and
techniques of two or more other disciplines in historical research. A
historian’s perspective is a very broad perspective. A historian cannot limit
the scope of history. This is a holistic approach and establishes the
relationship between history and other disciplines of social science and it is
also related to the natural sciences.
Generally, the interdisciplinary approach is adopted in order to achieve the following objectives:
1. To answer a complex
question;
2. To address broad issues;
3. To solve problems that are
beyond the limit of one discipline; and
4.
To achieve unity of knowledge
An
interdisciplinary study is a process of answering a question, solving a problem, or addressing a topic that is too broad or complex to be dealt with
adequately by a single discipline. It relates to different disciplines by
integrating their insights to construct a more comprehensive understanding. The interdisciplinary approach in history represents historians' use of concepts
and techniques developed by scholars in other disciplines.
Contributions of Annales School
In the modern
context, the interdisciplinary approach in history was well-established by the
works of the Annales School of historiography. It was widely considered as one
of the most important developments in twentieth-century history writing.
Annales School formally emerged with the foundation of the journal ‘Annales
of Economic and Social History’ in 1929 by Marc Bloch and Lucien Febvre. It
emphasized the necessity and benefits of adopting themes by breaking
disciplinary boundaries.
Consequently,
newer themes were taken for the historian’s exploration. Marc Bloch himself
created a two-volume book, The Feudal Society, which gives a
comprehensive account of feudalism.
Lucien Febvre studied the area of emotions and beliefs and produced a
celebrated essay, ‘Sensibility and History: How to Reconstitute the Emotional
Life of the Past’. History was thus beginning to become a part of the Social
Sciences.
It was an
invitation to historians to learn from Economics, Sociology, Anthropology and
Geography. Later, Annales historians such as Fernand Braudel (studied the Mediterranean by depicting thousands of pictures), Georges Duby (the study of
marriage, family, and women), Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie, Robert Mandrou, Jacques
Le Goff (studied the history of mentalities) and many others contributed
to the development of the interdisciplinary approach to history.
Stages of Development
The interdisciplinary approach to history mainly passed through three stages regarding its adoption
of disciplinary themes.
(i) At the beginning stage, it was primarily confined to the "social sciences". Historians adopted
themes, concepts, and techniques from sociology, economics, political science,
and anthropology for new ideas and analysis.
(ii) In the second stage,
historians began to use the techniques and methods of statistics and
mathematics to a lesser degree. Quantitative analysis of data, diagrams and statistical charts found its way to historical writing.
(iii) In its later stage,
historians have turned to "humanistic" disciplines such as language
studies, poetics, literary criticism, and philosophy. Now new theories and
concepts like structuralism, new historicism, epistemology, ontology, and other
philosophical theories found its place in historical study.
The Postmodern Intervention
The
postmodern thinkers totally rejected the idea of ‘disciplinary boundaries’. The
writings of postmodern thinkers exhibit this new turn of interdisciplinary
studies. Michel Foucault’s books like Madness and Civilization, The
Birth of the Clinic, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, and The History of Sexuality give the best examples of this new turn in
the interdisciplinary approach. The postmodern thinkers brought philosophical
concepts and theories to the study of history.
Benefits of Interdisciplinary
Approach to History
- The interdisciplinary approach broadened and deepened the study of history
- It brought new themes and ideas to historical writing
- It extended the domain of history
- It elevated history from a mere narration of facts to a knowledge-producing subject
- It brought philosophical concepts, theories, and ideas to historical analysis
- It brought new kinds of sources, methods, and techniques to historical writing
- It opened the possibilities of using multiple theories, concepts, and methods in historical research
- It integrated the best elements of disciplinary insights in order to generate a more comprehensive perspective.
On the whole, the interdisciplinary approach to history changed the course of historical writing and initiated the emergence of new branches in history.
Thanks for putting in a nutshell the entire topic. References would be appreciated
ReplyDeletewhat about the present research going on in India
ReplyDeleteThanks for putting in anutshell
ReplyDeleteThank you for these words. Have your words been published elsewhere?
ReplyDeleteThank you, well appreciated
ReplyDeleteUseful 👏
ReplyDeleteThankyou sir
ReplyDelete